Am I Permitted to Talk about Me?
Padlock IconThis article is only a portion of the full article. If you are already a premium subscriber please login. If you are not a premium subscriber, please subscribe for access to all of our content.

Published in: March-April 2007 issue.

THE IMAGE you see below was the first page of my biography at my website, for the last seven years. This short version of my life from birth to graduation from law school told what I saw as most relevant about who I am. Recently, the company that provides banking services to my site (they collect membership subscriptions) informed me that this was a picture of an underage person and had to be removed. A law known as 18 U.S.C. 2257 has made companies like my banking agent the censoring instruments of the State. I was told that any representation of any kind of a minor is banned if it is associated with an “adult” site. Period.
Tom Bianchi
The law requires me, among other things, to keep photo IDs of anyone I shoot on file (together with myriad other data) and place statements that I am in compliance with the law in my work. The law is intended to require me to prove that I am not abusing children, I think. But rather than frontally dealing with that issue, it has created a body of laymen censors who restrict speech—speech that unquestionably is protected by the Constitution—as they attempt to interpret an incomprehensible set of rules under a draconian law.

To continue reading this article, please LOGIN or SUBSCRIBE


Read More from TOM BIANCHI